Afghanistan — Old Ammunition Poses Problem in Afghanistan

WASHINGTON, June 1, 2010 — Some homes have attics, base­ments or garages full of extra things that sim­ply don’t get thrown away. Inter­na­tion­al forces in Afghanistan have found that such a hoard­ing men­tal­i­ty applies to ammu­ni­tion, regard­less of its qual­i­ty.

Dur­ing a May 28 “DoD Live” blog­gers round­table, Army Col. Ronald L. Green, logis­tics direc­tor for Com­bined Secu­ri­ty Tran­si­tion Com­mand Afghanistan, dis­cussed the dan­gers sur­round­ing old ammu­ni­tion stock­piles and the chal­lenges the NATO train­ing mis­sion faces in get­ting rid of them. 

Over the past three years, the train­ing com­mand has iden­ti­fied 6,325 met­ric tons of unsafe and sur­plus ammu­ni­tion, Green said, but its removal and destruc­tion requires approval from the Afghan defense min­istry and an OK from Afghan Pres­i­dent Hamid Karzai. New reports of ammu­ni­tion stock­piles, some near­ly 40 years old, con­tin­ue to come in, the colonel added. “The lat­est one was at an air­field sup­ply port, where we found anoth­er 380 met­ric tons,” he said. 

Green said it’s com­mon for armies to destroy expired ammo, as its use, even in train­ing sit­u­a­tions, could put sol­diers’ lives in dan­ger. “Quite frankly, we destroy a lot of [our] ammo, because it just goes bad,” he said. “And our hands are tied right now, because we can­not destroy one ounce of [this expired Afghan] ammo.” 

Though he has tried to influ­ence the defense min­istry offi­cials to destroy the old ammo, Green said, the “cul­tur­al affin­i­ty toward hoard­ing” in Afghanistan tends to over­ride his suggestions. 

“They don’t want to be the one that destroyed it, and it could be used against them lat­er on, because [the stock­piles are] a nation­al trea­sure in their eyes.” 

While the hoard­ing of old ammu­ni­tion most­ly amounts to a waste of stor­age space that could be bet­ter used, Green said, some in the Afghan defense min­istry think the ammu­ni­tion is suit­able for use. “If you can clean off a 40-year-old round and buff it down, to a point where it looks like new brass, they believe it’s good,” he said. 

Inter­na­tion­al forces in Afghanistan will have spent about $1.2 bil­lion for ammu­ni­tion, fac­tor­ing in the next four years, Green esti­mat­ed, for both NATO forces and for the Afghan army. Because they can’t remove old ammu­ni­tion, he said, they’re run­ning out of space quickly. 

About 1.3 mil­lion pounds of ammonite, an explo­sive com­pound, is being stored in Her­at. It was placed there by the Indi­an gov­ern­ment to help with the con­struc­tion of a dam — “a very good rea­son to have that type of com­mer­cial-grade explo­sives,” Green said. 

How­ev­er, Green said, the mate­r­i­al has degrad­ed over the year or two it’s been there, and it could be used for nefar­i­ous pur­pos­es. He not­ed that the April 19, 1995, bomb­ing of a fed­er­al build­ing in Okla­homa City was accom­plished with 3,000 pounds of low-grade explosives. 

“This is com­mer­cial-grade,” he said of the explo­sive mate­r­i­al being stored in Her­at. “And we’re talk­ing 1.3 to 1.5 mil­lion pounds. So this is what keeps me up at night.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →