Afghanistan — NATO Trainers Increase Literacy in Afghan Forces

WASHINGTON, July 15, 2010 — A lot has been said about the impor­tance of train­ing Afghan forces in the NATO mis­sion there. But with an illit­er­a­cy rate reach­ing in some test groups high­er than 89 per­cent, how can one teach a large group of recruits to be engi­neers or logis­ti­cians?

Mike Faugh­nan, head of edu­ca­tion for the NATO Train­ing Mission-Afghanistan’s Com­bined Secu­ri­ty Tran­si­tion Com­mand, addressed the issue yes­ter­day on a DoDLive Blog­gers Round­table. In 2008, a lit­er­a­cy pro­gram was estab­lished to train new recruits and exist­ing mem­bers of Afghan nation­al secu­ri­ty forces who are either illit­er­ate or don’t meet the 3rd-grade-lev­el math, read­ing and com­pre­hen­sion min­i­mum stan­dard.

About 25,000 Afghan per­son­nel cur­rent­ly are enrolled in the pro­gram; by July 2011 Faugh­nan expects to have 100,000 stu­dents enrolled. To date, about 4,300 Afghans have grad­u­at­ed from the pro­gram.

“Illit­er­a­cy is a prob­lem we have to tack­le if we intend to turn the ANSF into a mod­ern mil­i­tary and police force,” he said. “The impact of illit­er­a­cy that we see is an inabil­i­ty to per­form the mis­sions and duties of the army and police, lim­i­ta­tions in the types of train­ing we can pro­vide — every­thing has to be hands-on — and lim­i­ta­tions in the lev­els of train­ing. We can’t do any­thing more than train at the very basic lev­el in any of the fields that we work with.”

Faugh­nan faces a num­ber of chal­lenges in improv­ing Afghan lit­er­a­cy, but the biggest one by far is the stag­ger­ing num­ber of illit­er­ate recruits. Though the illit­er­a­cy rate among offi­cers is only about sev­en per­cent, among enlist­ed sol­diers the rate is upwards of 89 per­cent.

“I think the two biggest chal­lenges are the sheer scope of the prob­lem; the num­ber of recruits who require this train­ing,” he said. “The sec­ond chal­lenge is incor­po­rat­ing the lit­er­a­cy instruc­tion into the oper­a­tional require­ments of the field­ed force and the force in the train­ing base.”

The course requires 312 hours of instruc­tion — 64 hours of 1st-grade-lev­el edu­ca­tion, 128 hours to reach a 2nd-grade lev­el, and 120 hours after that to reach 3rd grade under­stand­ing and grad­u­ate, Faugh­nan said. The whole course can take as lit­tle as eight weeks, if mis­sion require­ments allow troops to attend eight hours of class dai­ly. Due to mis­sion require­ments, how­ev­er, most troops attend lit­er­a­cy class­es only an hour or so a day. On that sched­ule, he said, the course can take sev­en to eight months.

One method to help in spread­ing the train­ing is the way it’s set up. NTM‑A sends train­ers into the field to teach Dari and Pash­to, rather than cre­at­ing a cen­tral lit­er­a­cy school for thou­sands of troops to attend. Cur­rent­ly they have about 700 Afghan teach­ers; more will be hired in the future as more stu­dents enroll, Faugh­nan said.

“We are very flex­i­ble in the way we deliv­er [lit­er­a­cy train­ing], pre­fer­ring to get the train­ing to the stu­dents, how­ev­er the oper­a­tional com­mand can fit it into their sched­ule,” he said.

The Afghan Min­istry of Edu­ca­tion pro­vides the course mate­ri­als, adapt­ed from oth­er min­istry adult edu­ca­tion texts. They’re writ­ten, print­ed and dis­trib­uted by Afghans, then the cours­es are taught by Afghans, who make between $500 and $600 month­ly. Entry-lev­el Afghan sol­diers make about $240 month­ly, a liv­ing wage in the nation.

“Obvi­ous­ly, to meet the goals that we’ve estab­lished, we will be hir­ing some more [teach­ers]; I don’t think it’s real­ly going to be a prob­lem get­ting the num­ber of teach­ers we need,” Faugh­nan said. “I believe there are a suf­fi­cient num­ber of lit­er­ate Afghans who are look­ing for sta­ble work — we present a very good oppor­tu­ni­ty for them, as well.”

In the long term, Faugh­nan expects the pro­gram to stay in exis­tence as long as there’s a NATO pres­ence in the coun­try, unless the state of Afghan edu­ca­tion improves to where no large-scale adult lit­er­a­cy train­ing is nec­es­sary. He does­n’t think it will be a fac­tor in the July 2011 troop draw­down in Afghanistan.

“I don’t see that there would be a con­nec­tion between the lit­er­a­cy train­ing we pro­vide and any future draw­down,” Faugh­nan said. “The train­ing we pro­vide is real­ly focused on mak­ing the indi­vid­ual — and by exten­sion the ANSF — a much more effec­tive force.”

“At the min­i­mum, we’ll be doing this as long as [our troops are] here,” he added.

Faugh­nan said he expects the lit­er­a­cy pro­gram to lead to more wide­spread edu­ca­tion reform in Afghanistan, and ulti­mate­ly make sig­nif­i­cant inroads into the nation’s illit­er­a­cy prob­lem.

“The abil­i­ty to read and write opens the world to a host of pos­si­bil­i­ties that you can’t dream of until you have the capa­bil­i­ty,” he said. “As a con­se­quence, we think that this pro­gram is going to have far-reach­ing effects as new­ly lit­er­ate sol­diers return to their fam­i­lies and vil­lages with the capa­bil­i­ty to read and write.”

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →