Afghanistan — Chairman Calls Kandahar Operations ‘Critical’

Chair­man Calls Kan­da­har Oper­a­tions ‘Crit­i­cal’

By Jim Gara­mone
Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice

SHANNON, Ire­land — Kan­da­har is the cen­ter of grav­i­ty for oper­a­tions in Afghanistan for at least the rest of this year, the chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said today.

“I think Kan­da­har is as crit­i­cal in this time­frame in Afghanistan as Bagh­dad was in Iraq dur­ing the surge,” Navy Adm. Mike Mullen said to reporters trav­el­ing with him to Afghanistan.

Army Gen. Stan­ley A. McChrys­tal, the NATO and U.S. com­man­der in Afghanistan, has announced that Kan­da­har is the next tar­get for Afghan and coali­tion forces. The gen­er­al wants to build on the lessons learned in the Mar­ja cam­paign in Hel­mand province for oper­a­tions in and around Afghanistan’s sec­ond-largest city.

Kan­da­har was the spir­i­tu­al home of Mul­lah Omar and the Tal­iban and remains impor­tant to the Tal­iban. McChrys­tal said ear­li­er this month that shap­ing oper­a­tions in and around the city have begun. Some of these oper­a­tions will be polit­i­cal, he said, and oth­ers are secu­ri­ty-relat­ed, but coali­tion and Afghan forces will move for­ward with the full sup­port of the Afghan gov­ern­ment.

The two areas of high­est risk are gov­er­nance and the police, the chair­man said, not­ing that effec­tive gov­er­nance has to be at all lev­els: local, provin­cial and fed­er­al. “It is gov­er­nance at the vil­lage lev­el that I am … con­cerned about,” Mullen said, “because that’s the lev­el of gov­ern­ment that will deliv­er goods and ser­vices to peo­ple who are des­per­ate.”

Train­ing the police has been a prob­lem, the chair­man acknowl­edged, but he said he feels con­fi­dent that the right process­es and sys­tems are in place now.

Cor­rup­tion is a prob­lem in Kan­da­har, and an anti-cor­rup­tion task force has been oper­at­ing in the region. “It’s still ear­ly, but I’m anx­ious to hear their con­clu­sions,” the chair­man said.

Deal­ing with cor­rup­tion and putting in place hon­est gov­er­nance are the keys to Kan­da­har, the admi­ral told reporters. “We will be unable to suc­ceed in Kan­da­har if we can­not elim­i­nate a vast major­i­ty of cor­rup­tion there and set up a legit­i­mate gov­er­nance struc­ture,” he said. “We can suc­ceed mil­i­tar­i­ly, but it’s not going to work” if local gov­ern­ment can­not serve the peo­ple fair­ly.

Since Kan­da­har is the cen­ter of grav­i­ty, suc­cess or fail­ure there will have ram­i­fi­ca­tions far beyond its bor­ders.

Mullen vis­its Afghanistan at least once a quar­ter to assess what’s hap­pen­ing on the ground and see if it match­es up with what he is told in the Pen­ta­gon.

In Region­al Com­mand South, the admi­ral said, he wants not only to see the com­bat side of oper­a­tions, but also to meet with the civil­ian lead­er­ship to assess how the gov­er­nance por­tion of the “clear, hold, build” strat­e­gy is work­ing.

“This starts at the local lev­el and goes right up to Kab­ul,” Mullen said.

The chair­man said agrees with Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates that any nego­ti­a­tion with Tal­iban lead­ers would be pre­ma­ture. He said allies tell him the coali­tion should nego­ti­ate only from a posi­tion of strength, “and in my judg­ment, we’re not there yet.”

“There has to be a polit­i­cal strat­e­gy [toward rec­on­cil­i­a­tion] in Afghanistan,” he added. “We’re real­ly sort­ing our way to this.”

The chair­man also said he was pleased with the strate­gic dia­logue meet­ings between the Unit­ed States and Pak­istan last week in Wash­ing­ton. The meet­ings reflect­ed a whole-of-gov­ern­ment approach, with min­is­ters from all agen­cies and dis­ci­plines dis­cussing mutu­al inter­ests and con­cerns.

Pak­istani offi­cials told Mullen that they noticed “a sea change” in the atti­tude of Con­gress toward them, he said.

Mullen said he takes a long view of the U.S.-Pakistani rela­tion­ship. He has vis­it­ed with Gen. Asfaq Kayani of the Pak­istani army 19 times since being named chair­man, he said, because he and oth­er U.S. lead­ers must mend ties with Pak­istan. The Unit­ed States broke off mil­i­tary-to-mil­i­tary rela­tions with the coun­try in 1992. It was­n’t until 2002 that nor­mal rela­tions resumed. Re-devel­op­ing trust will take time, the chair­man said.

Meet­ings like the strate­gic dia­logue “are all part of the edu­ca­tion process, the under­stand­ing process, the see­ing it from both sides process that a cou­ple two years ago was­n’t there,” Mullen said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →