Afghanistan — Afghanistan Visit Gives Mullen Reassurance, Concern

WASHINGTON, June 29, 2010 — The chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said yes­ter­day that he returned from Afghanistan this week reas­sured that U.S. and NATO forces remain on track there, but also con­cerned about the syn­er­gy among ter­ror­ist groups in the region.

Navy Adm. Mike Mullen made the com­ments yes­ter­day as part of an inter­view with David Sanger, New York Times chief Wash­ing­ton cor­re­spon­dent, at the inau­gur­al Aspen Secu­ri­ty Forum, part of the Aspen Insti­tute, in Col­orado.

Mullen said his trip to Afghanistan, Pak­istan and Israel was sched­uled before the fall­out from a mag­a­zine arti­cle on Army Gen. Stan­ley A. McChrys­tal that led to the general’s res­ig­na­tion as com­man­der of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

“Because of what hap­pened,” Mullen said, refer­ring to McChrystal’s removal, “it was a trip of reas­sur­ance. We’ll have a new leader out there very quick­ly, and we also have a very able deputy there now” in British Lt. Gen. Nicholas Park­er. “The strat­e­gy has­n’t changed, nor has our focus,” he said.

Mullen met with Afghan Pres­i­dent Hamid Karzai, who he said was reas­sured that the lead­er­ship tran­si­tion will be smooth. Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, com­man­der of U.S. Cen­tral Com­mand, is in the con­fir­ma­tion process to replace McChrys­tal.

“I want­ed to make sure we are stay­ing focused on the mis­sion, and I report back that clear­ly all the peo­ple I saw were,” Mullen said of his trip.

Mullen said McChrystal’s res­ig­na­tion is dif­fer­ent from removals of mil­i­tary lead­ers under Pres­i­dents Abra­ham Lin­coln and Dwight D. Eisen­how­er, and even the 2008 res­ig­na­tion of Navy Adm. William J. Fal­lon as head of Cen­tral Com­mand, because it was not based on pol­i­cy dif­fer­ences. Although he nev­er heard McChrys­tal speak neg­a­tive­ly of civil­ian lead­ers, Mullen said, his res­ig­na­tion was impor­tant in light of the arti­cle, which includ­ed pas­sages in which McChrys­tal and mem­bers of his staff were por­trayed as dis­mis­sive of some civil­ian admin­is­tra­tion offi­cials.

“This goes back to the 1770s,” Mullen said. “It’s such a fun­da­men­tal prin­ci­ple. We have enor­mous chal­lenges now, but that’s not an excuse in any way, shape or form for any of us to not rec­og­nize the impor­tance of the civil­ian con­trol of our mil­i­tary.”

As for oper­a­tions in Afghanistan, the chair­man said he returned with increas­ing con­cerns that ter­ror­ist groups are oper­at­ing more close­ly with one anoth­er, not just in South­west Asia, but also with men charged in recent attempt­ed ter­ror­ist attacks in Detroit and New York.

“I’m increas­ing­ly con­cerned about the syn­er­gy among ter­ror­ist groups in that region and their expand­ing desire to kill as many Amer­i­cans – and not just Amer­i­cans – as they can,” he said.

Mullen acknowl­edged the length of the near­ly decade-long war, but empha­sized its impor­tance.

“There aren’t any of us who don’t want to see this end as soon as we can,” he said. “But, com­ing back from this trip, I am increas­ing­ly con­cerned about the ter­ror­ist threat in the region. The war in Afghanistan was some­thing very bad­ly resourced – under-resourced — for a num­ber of years. We’re just get­ting to a point where it is resourced, and the gov­ern­ment and cor­rup­tion issue [in Afghanistan], as well as secu­ri­ty, is com­pre­hen­sive­ly being addressed.”

In the long term, Mullen said, the solu­tion to ter­ror­ism is more about the glob­al econ­o­my than mil­i­tary oper­a­tions.

“You can’t kill them all,” he said of the issue of deal­ing with extrem­ists and ter­ror­ists. “We’ve got to get to a point where 15-year-old boys pur­sue a more pos­i­tive way of life than putting on a sui­cide vest.” That’s a long way off, Mullen said, adding that a long-term solu­tion needs lead­er­ship from the Mus­lim com­mu­ni­ty to stand up against the des­e­cra­tion of their reli­gion by ter­ror­ists.

In the short term, Mullen said, oper­a­tions in Kan­da­har are ongo­ing, and results won’t be appar­ent until the end of the year. Oper­a­tions there will ramp up after the remain­ing one-third of the U.S. surge troops are in place lat­er this sum­mer, he added.

The NATO cam­paign that took Mar­ja in Hel­mand province from the Tal­iban ear­li­er this year under­es­ti­mat­ed the abil­i­ty to set up a new local gov­ern­ment there, the chair­man said. But while secu­ri­ty remains a chal­lenge in Mar­ja, he added, “steady progress” has con­tin­ued, and schools and bazaars are open.

Mullen said he has sup­port­ed from the begin­ning Obama’s stat­ed time­line of July 2011 to begin draw­ing down in Afghanistan, because it cre­ates a sense of urgency in the Afghan gov­ern­ment to take con­trol. “A lot is going to hap­pen between now and July 2011,” he said.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →