Afghanistan — Afghanistan Still Crucial to U.S. Interests, Obama Says

WASHINGTON, June 28, 2010 — Afghanistan remains cru­cial to Amer­i­can nation­al inter­ests, and the Unit­ed States will need to pro­vide assis­tance to that nation for years, Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma said in Toron­to yes­ter­day.

Dur­ing a break in the G‑20 Sum­mit, Oba­ma said Afghanistan can­not again become a launch­ing pad for ter­ror­ist attacks. The pres­i­dent added that Afghanistan will require help even after it becomes respon­si­ble for its own security. 

“I think that we’re going to need to pro­vide assis­tance to Afghanistan for a long time to come,” Oba­ma said. 

The Afghans still are build­ing their nation­al, provin­cial and local gov­ern­ments, the pres­i­dent added, and secu­ri­ty is nec­es­sary so that Afghans can plant the seeds for their nation’s economy. 

Afghanistan today is “a very poor coun­try,” Oba­ma said. 

“So on a whole range of issues – from eco­nom­ic, devel­op­ment, set­ting up courts, set­ting up effec­tive police forces, a polit­i­cal sys­tem that is trans­par­ent and fair, as well as with respect to secu­ri­ty – we intend to be a part­ner with Afghanistan over the long term,” he said. “But that is dif­fer­ent from us hav­ing troops on the ground.” 

The U.S. mil­i­tary surge the pres­i­dent approved is under way in Afghanistan. It’s designed to pro­vide the Afghan gov­ern­ment the space and the time to build up its secu­ri­ty forces and to blunt the momen­tum of the Tal­iban. U.S. and allied troops are pro­vid­ing secu­ri­ty to improve governance. 

The change in com­mand for inter­na­tion­al and U.S. forces in Afghanistan from Army Gen. Stan­ley A. McChrys­tal to Army Gen. David H. Petraeus will not hin­der the mission’s impe­tus, the pres­i­dent said, not­ing that U.S. allies in the Inter­na­tion­al Secu­ri­ty Assis­tance Force and Afghan Pres­i­dent Hamid Karzai endorsed it. 

Progress in Afghanistan will be tough, the pres­i­dent acknowl­edged, but he added that he expects real, mea­sur­able progress by the end of the year. 

“We will con­duct a full review,” Oba­ma said. “Those things that are not work­ing, we will fix. Those things that are work­ing we will build on — both on the civil­ian side and on the mil­i­tary side.” 

U.S. poli­cies in Afghanistan are com­pli­cat­ed, the pres­i­dent point­ed out. 

“Right now, the debate sur­round­ing Afghanistan is pre­sent­ed as either we get up and leave imme­di­ate­ly because there’s no chance at a pos­i­tive out­come, or we stay basi­cal­ly indef­i­nite­ly and do what­ev­er it takes for as long as it takes,” Oba­ma said. “And what I said last year I will repeat, which is we have a vital nation­al inter­est in mak­ing sure that Afghanistan is not used as a base to launch ter­ror­ist attacks.” 

The Afghan peo­ple want the same things all oth­er peo­ple want: basic rule of law, a voice in gov­er­nance, eco­nom­ic oppor­tu­ni­ty, basic phys­i­cal secu­ri­ty, elec­tric­i­ty, roads, and an abil­i­ty to get a har­vest to mar­ket and get a fair price for it with­out hav­ing to pay bribes in between, the pres­i­dent said. 

“I think we can make a dif­fer­ence, and the coali­tion can make a dif­fer­ence, in them meet­ing those aspi­ra­tions even as we are meet­ing our secu­ri­ty inter­ests,” he said. “Those two things are tied together.” 

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs) 

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefence.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →