Acquisitions Office Focuses on Information Gathering

WASHINGTON, June 6, 2011 — When senior Defense Depart­ment lead­ers sit down to make tough pol­i­cy deci­sions on major acqui­si­tions sys­tems that inevitably get the atten­tion of every­one from the sec­re­tary of defense to Con­gress and the pres­i­dent, they rely on the work of a small office of pub­lic ser­vants here who are qui­et­ly chang­ing the par­a­digm on infor­ma­tion gath­er­ing.
“It’s work that does­n’t seem that sexy, but it is fun­da­men­tal to the foun­da­tion of the depart­ment,” Mark E. Krzysko, deputy direc­tor of Enter­prise Infor­ma­tion and Office of the Sec­re­tary of Defense Stud­ies, said in a June 2 inter­view with Amer­i­can Forces Press Ser­vice.

Krzysko had just com­plet­ed a pre­sen­ta­tion at the Asso­ci­a­tion for Enter­prise Infor­ma­tion Emerg­ing DOD Infor­ma­tion Plat­forms Con­fer­ence here, held in the same defense indus­try com­plex of high-rise office build­ings as his, a cou­ple miles south of the Pen­ta­gon.

It’s a niche field in which dis­cus­sions are laden with terms such as “ser­vice-ori­ent­ed archi­tec­ture,” “seman­tic tech­nolo­gies” and “agile method­olo­gies.” But before the tech­ni­cal talk begins, Krzysko reminds his col­leagues of the end users of the major sys­tems for which they col­lect data.

The sec­ond slide in his Pow­er­Point pre­sen­ta­tion shows two sol­diers stand­ing with three Afghan chil­dren, and a sec­ond pho­to of a remem­brance to a fall­en U.S. ser­vice mem­ber. “Remem­ber those who serve; remem­ber those who made the ulti­mate sac­ri­fice,” he said.

Enter­prise Infor­ma­tion and OSD Stud­ies began as a pilot pro­gram that was char­tered in the Pentagon’s acqui­si­tions office in 2008. It falls under the purview of Nan­cy Spruill, direc­tor of acqui­si­tion resources and analy­sis. Its begin­nings can be traced to the mid-1980s when, the depart­ment began work­ing to devel­op stan­dard pro­to­cols for data shar­ing between gov­ern­ment and indus­try.

EI’s spe­cif­ic charge is to com­pile infor­ma­tion on major acqui­si­tions pro­grams quick­ly and with con­sis­tent met­rics and pro­to­col, Krzysko said.

In the past, lead­ers could get inun­dat­ed with insuf­fi­cient infor­ma­tion devel­oped by mul­ti­ple sources with dif­fer­ent method­olo­gies, Krzysko said. In today’s envi­ron­ment of asym­met­ri­cal threats and uncer­tain bud­gets, lead­ers need the right infor­ma­tion quick­ly, he said.

“If we cre­ate an orga­ni­za­tion that can tack­le these prob­lems, we are in a bet­ter posi­tion to help those who serve,” he said. “You could con­found your­self with more infor­ma­tion, but it’s about get­ting the right infor­ma­tion quick­ly.”

Defense Sec­re­tary Robert M. Gates has direct­ed that any bud­get cuts be done through care­ful risk analy­sis, not the kind of across-the-board cuts that have led to past “hol­low­ing out” of the mil­i­tary. The depart­ment iden­ti­fied $78 bil­lion in sav­ings over five years through the effi­cien­cies ini­tia­tive Gates announced last sum­mer. That review began in acqui­si­tions, with at least 20 sys­tems being cur­tailed or can­celled.

Pres­i­dent Barack Oba­ma has since asked that DOD lead­ers look for an addi­tion­al $400 bil­lion in sav­ings over 12 years, mak­ing Enter­prise Information’s work that much more crit­i­cal. With a focus on the devel­op­ment and demon­stra­tion phase of acqui­si­tions pro­grams, the Enter­prise Infor­ma­tion office works to reply to requests for infor­ma­tion in weeks or months, not years, and pro­vides month­ly reviews of major sys­tems cov­er­ing some $1.7 tril­lion, Krzysko said.

Defense lead­ers “decide which side they want to push on,” he said. “They tell us what their pri­or­i­ties are, and we go after it.”

The office has been break­ing some of the his­tor­i­cal par­a­digms of gath­er­ing and using infor­ma­tion, not just in the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment, but also in indus­try, Krzysko said. It uses more than 180 data points — and is on its way to increas­ing to 700 data points — to mea­sure the val­ue of dozens of pro­grams by look­ing at areas such as the sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy, abil­i­ty for sus­tain­ment, how it is admin­is­tered, and its abil­i­ty to meet mile­stones, he said.

“The end-game for us is about get­ting the deci­sion-mak­ers the best infor­ma­tion they can have,” he said. “Infor­ma­tion is nev­er real­ly per­fect. But if you have that author­i­ta­tive infor­ma­tion, you are bet­ter able to make those deci­sions.

“I real­ly view this as a core capa­bil­i­ty,” he added.

Source:
U.S. Depart­ment of Defense
Office of the Assis­tant Sec­re­tary of Defense (Pub­lic Affairs)

More news and arti­cles can be found on Face­book and Twit­ter.

Fol­low GlobalDefence.net on Face­book and/or on Twit­ter

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →