Pakistan: The New Script

Pakistan’s descrip­tion as the ful­crum of Asia is most emi­nent, as it is locat­ed at the junc­tion of South Asia, West Asia, Cen­tral Asia and Chi­na. Since its incep­tion Pak­istan has been trau­ma­tised by the weak­ness and bit­ter rival­ry between its state insti­tu­tions. Its lead­ers invari­ably have relied on exter­nal pow­ers to enforce or restore insti­tu­tion­al bal­ance. An oft quot­ed remark attrib­uted to the Amer­i­cans is that oil is too impor­tant com­mod­i­ty to be left to the will of the Arabs. Sim­i­lar­ly the Af-Pak region is too impor­tant to be sac­ri­ficed at the altar of the ‘sov­er­eign­ty of Pak­istan’. Pak­istan is at a crit­i­cal cross­roads of its his­to­ry. A very inci­sive analy­sis of recent devel­op­ments there by a for­mer R&AW offi­cer and mil­i­tary ana­lyst.

This arti­cle is pub­lished with the kind per­mis­sion of “Defence and Secu­ri­ty Alert (DSA) Mag­a­zine” New Del­hi-India

Defence and Security Alert (DSA

 -
Click to enlarge

Since its incep­tion Pak­istan has been trau­ma­tised by the weak­ness and bit­ter rival­ry between its state insti­tu­tions. Its lead­ers invari­ably have relied on exter­nal pow­ers to enforce or restore insti­tu­tion­al bal­ance. The cur­rent insta­bil­i­ty in Pak­istan there­fore should not come as a sur­prise because the insti­tu­tion­al bal­ance between the Pres­i­dent, the Prime Min­is­ter and the Army in the first place had been forged by the US as part of war against ter­ror­ism. Even then, the deal between Mushar­raf and Benazir Bhut­to was ham­mered by the US after a series of meet­ings in Dubai. Gen­er­al Kayani, who was then the ISI Chief under the Mushar­raf dis­pen­sa­tion, played a cru­cial role as a medi­a­tor. It is per­ti­nent to men­tion that Gen­er­al Kayani as a junior offi­cer had served as the Staff Offi­cer to Benazir Bhut­to dur­ing her first term as prime min­is­ter. It is anoth­er mat­ter that the script was briefly inter­rupt­ed by an impon­der­able (some say by design) i.e. assas­si­na­tion of Benazir Bhut­to.

2013 dead­line

It may also be recalled that in July 2010, it was Prime Min­is­ter Gilani, who gave a three year exten­sion to Gen­er­al Kayani. He is the first four-star gen­er­al to receive such an exten­sion from a demo­c­ra­t­ic gov­ern­ment. Gen Kayani is due to retire in Novem­ber 2013, which almost coin­cides with the end of pres­i­den­tial tenure of Zardari. Also the Direc­tor Gen­er­al of ISI Lt Gen Shu­ja Pasha is to retire in March this year and from all indi­ca­tions ema­nat­ing from Pak­istan, is not like­ly to get any fur­ther exten­sion. He is con­sid­ered very close to Gen­er­al Kayani and was also on extend­ed tenure since 2010. By next year there­fore the entire gov­ern­ing struc­ture of Pak­istan is due for change. It is obvi­ous that giv­en the crit­i­cal strate­gic exi­gen­cies the Amer­i­can estab­lish­ment can­not just afford to leave Pak­istan in the realm of impon­der­ables and walk into a geo-polit­i­cal vac­u­um.

Judi­cia­ry the fourth pil­lar

The stand­off between the judi­cia­ry, i.e. the Chief Jus­tice Iftikar Chaud­hary and Mushar­raf was con­sid­er­ably respon­si­ble for decline of Mushar­raf and his con­se­quen­tial exit from the pow­er struc­ture of Pak­istan and the coun­try as such. Even at this crit­i­cal junc­ture, the judi­cia­ry is play­ing the spear­head role in erod­ing the present dis­pen­sa­tion of Pres­i­dent Zardari and Prime Min­is­ter Gilani. In fact, there are com­men­ta­tors, who opine that pow­er play in Pak­istan is no longer con­fined to the machi­na­tions of Troi­ka, i.e. the Pres­i­dent, the Prime Min­is­ter and the Army Chief, but there is yet anoth­er pil­lar which has emerged and that is the ‘Judi­cia­ry’.

In the past, there have been indi­ca­tions about grow­ing US lever­ages in the Pak judi­cia­ry as well. In March 2000, when an angry Bill Clin­ton vis­it­ed Pak­istan for less than five hours, one of the per­sons that he met was the then Chief Jus­tice of Pak­istan, Jus­tice Irshad Hasan Khan. Hasan Abbas in his book Pakistan’s Drift into Extrem­ism writes:

Inter­est­ing­ly, the Pak­istani team that met Clin­ton also includ­ed Jus­tice Irshad H Khan, Chief Jus­tice of the Supreme Court of Pak­istan, who along with oth­er judges was con­duct­ing a hear­ing to decide whether Musharraf’s coup in Octo­ber 1999 was legit­i­mate and law­ful. It was unprece­dent­ed that the head of the judi­cia­ry was attend­ing such a meet­ing. It is believed that Clin­ton briefly con­versed with him in pri­vate dur­ing this short vis­it, but what was dis­cussed is not known. … Inter­est­ing­ly, a few weeks lat­er, a twelve-mem­ber bench of the Supreme Court of Pak­istan val­i­dat­ed the mil­i­tary takeover of Octo­ber 12, 1999, on the basis of the doc­trine of state neces­si­ty and gra­cious­ly gave Mushar­raf three years to accom­plish his agen­da and hold gen­er­al elec­tions.

Has the present cri­sis in Pak­istan engen­dered by a re-script­ing process of the Pak­istani dis­pen­sa­tion by and in favour of the strate­gic agen­da of the West par­tic­u­lar­ly the US, set in motion con­se­quent to the killing of Osama bin Laden?

Strate­gic agen­da

The great­est asset that Pak­istan has is its geo-strate­gic loca­tion. This asset has so far been sin­gu­lar­ly respon­si­ble for Pakistan’s mil­i­tarised nature of its nation­al dis­course and its sur­vival as a state. Pakistan’s descrip­tion as the ful­crum of Asia is most emi­nent, as it is locat­ed at the junc­tion of South Asia, West Asia, Cen­tral Asia and Chi­na. It has been at the cross­roads of var­i­ous ‘isms’ that these regions have spawned from time to time. In the ensu­ing era it is the Islam­ic ter­ror­ism.

The deal between Mushar­raf and Benazir Bhut­to was ham­mered by the US after a series of meet­ings in Dubai. Gen­er­al Kayani, who was then the ISI Chief under the Mushar­raf dis­pen­sa­tion, played a cru­cial role as a medi­a­tor. It is per­ti­nent to men­tion that Gen­er­al Kayani as a junior offi­cer had served as the Staff Offi­cer to Benazir Bhut­to dur­ing her first term as prime min­is­ter

It is an eter­nal aspect of geog­ra­phy that pow­er seek­ing influ­ence in Asia have had to either tra­verse through the land or region of present day Pak­istan or con­tend with it as a strate­gic inter­locu­tor. It was active­ly court­ed by the US in the ear­ly 50s and even as its impor­tance to the US start­ed to decline since the mid 60s, it once again assumed the sta­tus of a front­line state after the Sovi­et inva­sion of Afghanistan in 1979. Such was the crit­i­cal­i­ty of that peri­od, that the US was com­pelled to ignore Pakistan’s many mis­de­meanours, includ­ing its clan­des­tine nuclear pro­gramme. The free flow of weapons and the encour­age­ment and sup­port that the Islam­ic fun­da­men­tal­ists received from the US, imbued Pan-Islamism with mil­i­tant shades. The smug belief of the US that their dis­tance from the epi­cen­tre of Islam­ic ter­ror­ism afford­ed them rel­a­tive immu­ni­ty was shat­tered on 9 Sep­tem­ber 2001. Thus the USA’s mil­i­tary and strate­gic machin­ery had to revis­it Pak­istan in the form of ‘war against ter­ror’ to defang the Islam­ic ter­ror­ists.

The job is far from over and the strate­gic retreat of the US and its allies from the Af-Pak region at this junc­ture is unthink­able.

In fact, the geopo­lit­i­cal sce­nario in the region has become even more com­pli­cat­ed. Apart from con­cerns of glob­al ter­ror­ism, the Af-Pak region has stri­dent res­o­nance in West Asia, Cen­tral Asia, South Asia, in respect to Chi­na and the Indi­an Ocean. West Asia is under the grip of polit­i­cal upheaval, which threat­ens to shake the very foun­da­tions of most coun­tries in the region. The Iran­ian nuclear cri­sis is get­ting seri­ous by the day with increas­ing­ly bel­liger­ent pos­tures by the US and the Iran­ian lead­er­ship. The chasm between the Shia and Sun­ni pop­u­la­tions is get­ting dan­ger­ous. Islam­ic ter­ror­ism in form of Tal­iban con­tin­ues to inhib­it the restora­tion of civil­i­sa­tion in Afghanistan. An oft quot­ed remark attrib­uted to the Amer­i­cans is to the effect that oil is too impor­tant com­mod­i­ty to be left to the will of the Arabs. Sim­i­lar­ly the Af-Pak region, at least in the fore­see­able future, is too impor­tant to be sac­ri­ficed at the altar of the ‘sov­er­eign­ty of Pak­istan’.

This is the bench­mark. There­fore, the devel­op­ments in Pak­istan must be viewed in this back­drop.

Even at this crit­i­cal junc­ture, the judi­cia­ry is play­ing the spear­head role in erod­ing the present dis­pen­sa­tion of Pres­i­dent Zardari and Prime Min­is­ter Gilani

Cal­i­brat­ed leak

The imme­di­ate trig­ger for the cur­rent cri­sis in Pak­istan is the alleged com­mu­ni­ca­tion between the Pak­istan Ambas­sador to US, Hus­sain Haqqani (alleged­ly on behalf of Pres­i­dent Zardari) and the then US Chief of Defence Staff, Admi­ral Mike Mullen, wide­ly known as the ‘Mem­ogate Scan­dal’. In this memo, fears were expressed of a pos­si­ble mil­i­tary takeover and the Oba­ma admin­is­tra­tion had been urged to pre­vent it. Fur­ther, as a quid pro quo for US mil­i­tary and polit­i­cal help, the cur­rent Pak­istan dis­pen­sa­tion under Pres­i­dent Zardari had promised to car­ry out a com­plete revamp of the secu­ri­ty appa­ra­tus of Pak­istan to include the nuclear estab­lish­ment and pol­i­cy set­up and pro­vide carte blanche for the US in con­duct­ing mil­i­tary strikes with­in Pak­istan.

The con­duit who deliv­ered this memo is one Man­soor Ijaz, a US based busi­ness­man of Pak­istani ori­gin. Ijaz is no ordi­nary busi­ness­man. He is also a well-known media com­men­ta­tor and inter­na­tion­al nego­tia­tor. He was stead­fast in his sup­port to neo-con­ser­v­a­tive poli­cies of George Bush on Amer­i­can tele­vi­sion. He had also been involved in unof­fi­cial nego­ti­a­tions between US and the Sudanese gov­ern­ments with regard to extra­di­tion of Laden. He has all along been a fierce crit­ic of the Pak­istan Army.

In the past, there have been indi­ca­tions about grow­ing US lever­ages in the Pak judi­cia­ry as well. In March 2000, when an angry Bill Clin­ton vis­it­ed Pak­istan for less than five hours, one of the per­sons that he met was the then Chief Jus­tice of Pak­istan, Jus­tice Irshad H Khan

Hus­sain Haqqani is also known for his pro-US and anti-Army beliefs. This is more than appar­ent in the book Pak­istan: Between Mosque and Mil­i­tary authored by him. There­fore, the sud­den admis­sion by Man­soor Ijaz about the said memo is rather intrigu­ing. Even more intrigu­ing is the Admi­ral Mullen’s admis­sion that he knew of the Memo, but “thought noth­ing of it”.

Admi­ral Mullen can­not be so naïve so as not to fac­tor the upheaval that his admis­sion could cause with­in Pak­istan. In the field of diplo­ma­cy such admis­sions of secret com­mu­ni­ca­tions are con­sid­ered blas­phe­mous. It appears to be a delib­er­ate and cal­i­brat­ed leak.

US wish list

The con­tents of the alleged memo are sig­nif­i­cant. It clear­ly indi­cates that Pakistan’s approach in ‘war against ter­ror’ has been con­trary rather inim­i­cal to the US and is tac­it admis­sion that the mil­i­tary-intel­li­gence estab­lish­ment has been abet­ting ter­ror­ism and Pakistan’s nuclear arse­nal is unsafe in mil­i­tary hands. Sam­ple these (direct­ly quot­ed from the alleged memo):

  • Pres­i­dent of Pak­istan will order an inde­pen­dent inquiry into the alle­ga­tions that Pak­istan har­boured and offered assis­tance to OBL and oth­er senior Qae­da oper­a­tives …
  • The inquiry will be account­able and inde­pen­dent and result in find­ings of tan­gi­ble val­ue of the US gov­ern­ment and the Amer­i­can peo­ple …
  • The new nation­al secu­ri­ty team will imple­ment a pol­i­cy of either hand­ing over those left in the lead­er­ship of Al Qae­da or oth­er affil­i­at­ed ter­ror­ist groups who are still on Pak­istani soil …

An oft quot­ed remark attrib­uted to the Amer­i­cans is to the effect that oil is too impor­tant com­mod­i­ty to be left to the will of the Arabs. Sim­i­lar­ly the Af-Pak region, at least in the fore­see­able future, is too impor­tant to be sac­ri­ficed at the altar of the ‘sov­er­eign­ty of Pak­istan’

  • One of the great fears of the mil­i­tary-intel­li­gence estab­lish­ment is that with your stealth capa­bil­i­ties to enter and exit Pak­istani air­space at will, Pakistan’s nuclear assets are now legit­i­mate tar­gets. The new nation­al secu­ri­ty team is pre­pared, with full back­ing of the Pak­istani gov­ern­ment — ini­tial­ly civil­ian but even­tu­al­ly all three pow­er cen­tres — to devel­op an accept­able frame­work of dis­ci­pline for the nuclear pro­gramme. This effort was begun under the pre­vi­ous mil­i­tary regime, with accept­able results. We are pre­pared to reac­ti­vate those ideas and build on them in a way that brings Pakistan’s nuclear assets under a more ver­i­fi­able, trans­par­ent regime.
  • The new nation­al secu­ri­ty team will elim­i­nate Sec­tion S of the ISI charged with main­tain­ing rela­tions to the Tal­iban, Haqqani net­work, etc. This will dra­mat­i­cal­ly improve rela­tions with Afghanistan.
  • We are pre­pared to coop­er­ate ful­ly under the new nation­al secu­ri­ty team’s guid­ance with the Indi­an gov­ern­ment on bring­ing all per­pe­tra­tors of Pak­istani ori­gin to account for the 2008 Mum­bai attacks, whether out­side gov­ern­ment or inside any part of the gov­ern­ment, includ­ing its intel­li­gence agen­cies …

This alleged memo rather reads like the wish list of the US with the aim to cir­cum­scribe the mil­i­tary in Pak­istan. It clear­ly indi­cates that world’s secu­ri­ty can no longer be trad­ed with sov­er­eign­ty of Pak­istan. It is an indi­rect and open cau­tion to all future dis­pen­sa­tions of Pak­istan about the irrec­on­cil­able strate­gic con­cerns and inter­ests of the US.

The new script

To the US, the cur­rent dis­pen­sa­tion in Pak­istan, both polit­i­cal and mil­i­tary has out­lived its util­i­ty, rather it is now counter-pro­duc­tive and an embar­rass­ment as such. The alleged memo has trig­gered the process of realign­ment of polit­i­cal forces as var­i­ous insti­tu­tions in Pak­istan includ­ing the mil­i­tary. The Zardari — Gilani dis­pen­sa­tion has only got a tem­po­rary reprieve from the assertive Supreme Court. In the ulti­mate analy­sis the cur­rent polit­i­cal dis­pen­sa­tion will be com­pelled by the judi­cia­ry to step down, thus paving the way for elec­tions.

It appears that in the new polit­i­cal restruc­tur­ing Imran Khan and Mushar­raf will have dom­i­neer­ing roles, with pos­si­bly the for­mer as Prime Min­is­ter and the lat­ter as Pres­i­dent. The fact can­not be over­looked that all these years since his exit from pow­er, Musharraf’s home has been in Unit­ed King­dom.

There are no free lunch­es.

In few months time we may see a new polit­i­cal and mil­i­tary set­up in Pak­istan at the helm. This new dis­pen­sa­tion will be under con­stant US pres­sure to deliv­er on crit­i­cal issues like ‘ter­ror­ism’ and ‘safe­ty of nuclear weapons’. Of course, the new script too is fraught with impon­der­ables. Nev­er­the­less, its intent is ben­e­fi­cial to India. The mem­ogate promi­nent­ly refers to bring­ing to book the per­pe­tra­tors of Mum­bai attack

Mushar­raf is the best man to deliv­er on ‘ter­ror­ism’ and ‘nuclear’ con­cerns of the West, as he knows their nuts and bolts. Imran’s inter­na­tion­al image and more so his Pathan extrac­tion could prove to be of great advan­tage giv­en the cur­rent nature of reli­gious, region­al, social and eth­nic chasms in Pak­istan. The bias of Pak­istan pol­i­tics may move away from over­whelm­ing Sind­hi-Pun­jabi dom­i­na­tion. In all prob­a­bil­i­ty, the cur­rent Army lead­er­ship too would be cir­cum­scribed by the judi­cia­ry lat­ter.

Con­clu­sion

In few months time we may see a new polit­i­cal and mil­i­tary set­up in Pak­istan at the helm. This new dis­pen­sa­tion will be under con­stant US pres­sure to deliv­er on crit­i­cal issues like ‘ter­ror­ism’ and ‘safe­ty of nuclear weapons’. Of course, the new script too is fraught with impon­der­ables. Nev­er­the­less, its intent is ben­e­fi­cial to India. The mem­ogate promi­nent­ly refers to bring­ing to book the per­pe­tra­tors of Mum­bai attack.

About the Author
Col RSN Singh (retd — The writer is for­mer Research & Analy­sis Wing (R&AW) offi­cer and has authored books on strate­gic and mil­i­tary aspects.

Note by the Author:
To the US, the cur­rent dis­pen­sa­tion in Pak­istan, both polit­i­cal and mil­i­tary has out­lived its util­i­ty, rather it is now counter-pro­duc­tive and an embar­rass­ment as such. The alleged memo has trig­gered the process of realign­ment of polit­i­cal forces as var­i­ous insti­tu­tions in Pak­istan includ­ing the mil­i­tary. The Zardari — Gilani dis­pen­sa­tion has only got a tem­po­rary reprieve from the assertive Supreme Court. In the ulti­mate analy­sis the cur­rent polit­i­cal dis­pen­sa­tion will be com­pelled by the judi­cia­ry to step down, thus paving the way for elec­tions

Defence and Secu­ri­ty Alert (DSA
Defence and Secu­ri­ty Alert (DSA) mag­a­zine is the only ISO 9001:2008 cer­ti­fied, pre­mier world class, new wave month­ly mag­a­zine which fea­tures par­a­digm chang­ing in-depth analy­ses on defence, secu­ri­ty, safe­ty and sur­veil­lance, focus­ing on devel­op­ing and strate­gic future sce­nar­ios in India and around the world.

Team GlobDef

Team GlobDef

Seit 2001 ist GlobalDefence.net im Internet unterwegs, um mit eigenen Analysen, interessanten Kooperationen und umfassenden Informationen für einen spannenden Überblick der Weltlage zu sorgen. GlobalDefenc.net war dabei die erste deutschsprachige Internetseite, die mit dem Schwerpunkt Sicherheitspolitik außerhalb von Hochschulen oder Instituten aufgetreten ist.

Alle Beiträge ansehen von Team GlobDef →